Comments on: Lakers 108, Jazz 94

By: hustle.biz » Blog Archive » Lakers 108, Jazz 94

hustle.biz » Blog Archive » Lakers 108, Jazz 94 — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:04:00 +0000

[...] Lakers 108, Jazz 94 [...]

By: SHOWMAN3000

SHOWMAN3000 — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:55:56 +0000

Homie you ARE wrong Jordan is NOT over 50% lifetime with baskets down the stretch period. Key words “down the stretch” Bottom line that so called stat is an extremely vague stat for it doesn’t equate what a clutch player is including Michael “Jesus” Jordan. That stat doesn’t define clutch. I’m sure most greats weren’t 50% lifetime. So does that mean a nobody who went 3 for 3 on game enders with a prefect percentage more clutch than Jordan (rhetorical)? NO WAY!

Even if Kobe is significantly below then so is a lot of other tilted “clutch” players. Again that stat is a irrelevant stat for the simple fact you have to put in account for the score in the 4th quarter, the time, the shots taken in those last 5 minutes|2 minutes or anything below a minute, defensive plays to gain possessions leading up to the end of the game and in some cases assits. A clutch shooter is a shooter who helps you win the game in either an array of shots (of course some will be missed along the way) to be in the position to either win and/or tie the score to eventually win the game.

That stat is so of que that if hypothetically speaking Munot Bol made 6 game winners over a span of 14 yrs and only attempted 7 game winners then of course the statistic will make him look clutch. When in all reality out of 82 games each yr for 14 yrs and you only took 7 shots. Where’s the stats for all the times his teammates didn’t trust giving him the ball or the stat where he wasn’t apart of the drives to win in the 4th quarter in other games. The stat when no one trusted him to shoot the ball all those times and he just got layups off of a great pass from a good player who actually made the difficult play for him. The stat for how the games his team came back or were in tight situations and he barely shot the ball.

That 4th quarter stat holds little weight for ALL great clutch shooters.

By: RAE

RAE — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:22:31 +0000

if you read through a fuckin comment you would notice that i said when he was growing up you bitch, it was easy to bandwagon the 49ers in the late 80s and 90s wasn’t it?? fag. READ the comment before you respond. lakers fans in la aren’t band wagoners, but how about being a 9ers or a braves fan in la throughout the nineties. and for la teams, if dude is FROM la, how bout the rams or the raiders? they didnt win enough at that time huh??

By: omniscient

omniscient — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:28:25 +0000

jordan wasnt labeled clutch cuz of the media. he was clutch. jordan missed game winners, just not often. i was living and watching every bulls game during jordans dominance. dont tell me that jordan missed more game winners than he made cuz then your ignorance is showing. and your comment about “no point in showing those highlights anymore?” what are u even talking about?

By: SOC4L

SOC4L — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:08:43 +0000

how the fuck can a 49ers fan be a bandwagoner and how can u hate on him for not reppin his area when LA doesnt even have a fucking team? duumbass
anyway kobe doesnt make 50% of his game ending shots, nor has anyone who has put up a decent amount ever. You say we labeling Kobe clutch cuz of the media, which is true, but then you go and do the same with jordan. obviosly he missed game winners, theres jus no point to show those highlights anyomre. To the idiot talking about 81, that wasnt even this season so your opinion doesnt matter anymore.
Lakers fans in LA arent bandwagoners, im in LA, been a fan since i was a little kid, so stop being jealous MY region has the BEST team in the NBA about to go for another championship. Lebron is great but Kobe is greater period.

By: omniscient

omniscient — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:49:27 +0000

i will tell u again that michael jeffrey jordan shot over 50 percent on game winners. i know that we can all agree that kobe is no jordan, but i am just giving u an example of someone who was clutch.

all i was saying from the beginning is that it is crazy to me that dude hasnt even had ONE season where he shot over 50 percent on final possessions. everyone took it to another level and put words in my mouth that i never said. whether we have stats or not, i follow the nba every day since the early 90s and i know about every time that kobe has drained a game winner and every time that he has clunked it or turned the ball over. from this experience and knowledge, i can tell you that he is significantly below 50 percent in his career on last possessions.

By: fro

fro — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:40:52 +0000

wow some dudes is trippin. haha, yea shake on the bandwagon for the niners, who have terrible seasons lately, great team to bandwagon. i know dudes in northern cali who love the jazz and the bengals. if you been supportin a team forever and support them even through the bad times that clearly makes you a bandwagoner (sarcasm)

By: sfajbdfajs

sfajbdfajs — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:26:35 +0000

2 words

KO BE!

By: RAE

RAE — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:10:29 +0000

@ SHAKE

actually, yes liking the braves does make you extra gay. my point is that i rep the bay cuz im from the bay. you rep the lakers, niners and braves because you are a soft ass bangwagon hoppin homo, who’s sports fandom has no basis in integrity. i suppose you like the bulls and the bills too? maybe the cowboys? how bout the rockets? who else was good when you were a kid? faggot. just cuz you use internet lingo and emoticons to express yourself doesnt mean you’re superior.

By: L0$

L0$ — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:08:30 +0000

LAKERS FTW!